« Posts tagged keirkegaard

Reading Our Reflection: Self-help Requires Helping Your Self

I used to travel alot.

I didn’t do it for very long. Less than two years, in fact. But I did it for work and it was an interesting, valuable if not just a lonely time of my life. I imagine that if I did it enough I would have been able to make friends in all the major cities of the US. But I didn’t and I tried to fill my time in a variety of ways. These were all solitary activities; eating out, eating in, drinking, visiting odd places and of course, reading. I won’t get into my history with reading right now, but I will say that I did get to visit a variety of book stores in a variety of cities.

One of the things I noticed was that even in corporate book stores like borders — you could get a real feel for an area by the kinds of books in a bookshelf. (Used book stores were particularly telling.) One of the things people don’t often get is that cities are really too big to be easily encapsulated by one or two visits. You need to immerse yourself there. So bookstores explain alot about the surrounding community. For instance, I never did find an adequate philosophy section in the South. I did see lots of book on military history and a variety of bibles and bible related sections.

Well, I live in Los Angeles. So you can imagine the kinds of hipster art books, the kinds of poetry, po-mo writing, and local ‘underground’ literary scene. I say ‘underground’ because Los Angeles has a kind of inferiority complex when it comes to publishing (partly from being so remote from the literary powerhouses in New York)… One thing that’s disturbed me recently though, is the onslaught of self-help books. It says something about a group of people when you see, over the course of a few years, the section on Love and Sex grow from a shelf to a rack and now, in some book stores, two or three. For example, the collection in the aging hipster community of Sherman Oaks has TWO RACKS dedicated to how to have great sex, or have the secrets to tantric sex, or how to be more intimate with your partner… And it’s not just Sherman Oaks (bless those well-to-do souls), it’s also prevalent at the borders on mainstreet in Glendale, CA. You get things like sex-trology… if you happen to be a male taurus you’re in there. Or if you’re with a gay pisces of some sort, then you can find out all about their bedroom likes or dislikes! And if you have a crush… well, apparently astrology doesn’t exactly predict one’s perdiliction for sexual orientation, but it can tell you if they like it fast, or slow or how to plan your seduction. (More too, later on the new astrology… with the 13th sign… maybe)

Perhaps it’s my generation. And also, maybe the aging baby boomers who, having lived through the sexual revolution, need something more to excite them nowdays that they are older and well, less active… maybe. But you’d think that anyone who might’ve had tons of experience would know what they like. Anyway, isn’t the number of books being read dropping? There are plenty of studies that say that. But how many studies aim at looking for what it is people are actually reading? I have issues with most ‘classic’ literature. For instance, we might claim that Jane Eyre is out of vogue now. Okay. And anything George Elliot is in. Okay! Sure. But who would trash Kierkegaard? I think Repetition is a horrible work; a work of terrible emotional indulgence and infantile obsession-ism. Maybe I missed the point. Lots of everything is there, of course, we all eat, sleep, fall in love and struggle with our own demons or with each other. But it’s irrelevant. So what about the romance novels, the pure escapism of some fantasy literature or books on how to be a better lover (or in one case, how to be a bitch to get a man, since men love bitches…)? How can we understand all these kinds of works?

I think it’s pretty well supported that our media is a reflection of who we are, of what our concerns are. While some people were concerned about what American Idol says about our obsession with celebrity-dom, success and failure (making a ‘spectacle’ out of common people…) I seriously doubt most gave it much thought. Trash tv is recognized by everyone as being trash tv. Who really cares, anyway?

It’s not hurting anyone. There’s moral lessons to be learned by much of it. The bad guy loses. The good guy wins. The struggle goes on. It’s entertaining. And who doesn’t deserved to be entertained when we’ve had a tough day at work? Who cares about thinking or trying to be come a better person through self discovery?

And wasn’t Henry David Thoreau an asshole anyway? Walden is an incredibly pretentious book. He laments that the ‘common man’ can’t feel… at least not like he can… Who cares about that kind of internal dramatification? That Egotism? So why not read a book on how to be a better fuck? Why not read about how to eat and become a ‘skinny bitch‘?

If we take social media as a mirror, it seems more and more to me that we are hypnotized by how awful we are and more and more hysterical about how wonderful we should be (but aren’t). The problem with common men has always been just that — commonness. Somehow we should all be above average. Which is impossible. Our junk email shows us the value judgement that men should have super large penises and be able to ejaculate many times in one ‘session’. Women should all be oh so sexy. All the time. Even when they are waking up in the morning… with make up on perfectly, already. Of course we would want to watch in-human super-people, and identify with them. That’s nothing new. Stories, fables, whatever — are always about what some fantastic thing someone does.

After all, why would anyone want to hear about someone common having a common day?

I’m tempted to go off on how marketing needs to address their audience’s narcissism, or self-imagine. Or maybe talk about Victorian novels, which focused on the rich or becoming-rich. I don’t think most of us believe we will become famous or are upset because we all can’t be rockstars. I think most of us realize that we can’t realistically achieve those things — and most of us decide eventually that we want to settle for something achievable, like having a family or paying one’s bills on time. “There’s nothing special about me!” “I’m not upset that I can’t be rich.” I think it is safe to say that adult maturity comes with accepting one’s position in life… although part of me goes ‘Blah! Slave mentality! — Being an ‘adult’ means accepting your lot in life!’

But how many of us actually grow up? I don’t think it’s really that strange that kids who played video games for fun also play video games for fun as adults. And while we have a conception of adults (ie, sexual consent, as well as the right to drive, vote, drink, access pornography and the duty to serve in the military) as being responsible and mature, we might be surprised (somewhat) to be introduced to the concept that maturation and adulthood as contemporary concepts are only as new as 200 years old. Pretty much all traditions have rites for adulthood — but it’s only recently that we have the added baggage of autobiography, infant/childhood as a developmental period with the teenage years as being a period in our lives with all those expectations of awkwardness and… even more extended development. Becoming 13 didn’t necessary mean sexual maturation (many 13 year olds still have to ‘discover’ their sexual interest… although that number may be dipping lower and lower, who knows) — but being 13 today does come with the idea that one is still a child and can’t really decide what’s best for themself.  I don’t think it’s also a big surprise that teenage rebellion comes with sexual maturity… one has to cast off one’s parents and compete for resources if one wants to breed. But look, our world is complex, more so than before.  Our extended childhood means to teach us how to carry weight as an adult.  So, a dichotomy is formed:

Children = immature.
Adults = mature.

As youths we are told that we should behave and know our place. How do we get out of it? I’m not sure. When we enter the early 20s, we often get an explosion of experimentation and self discovery that comes with the removal of authority.  And we slowly learn that we really do have to take responsibility.  It’s generally a gradual process all the way into your late 20s and early 30s.  Now, to account for this oppression, I don’t think that American children are oppressed.  But I do think that our media hints about the desired life of an adult — party, sex, drugs, drinking and other kinds of behaviors that one should/could only do if one is an adult — and many kids trying to learn about themselves want that for themselves. They might watch a movie like Old School or Animal House and think that this is what college should be like. We see stories like this over and over — and we might assume it’s just a movie or just a story. But there also lacks a subtle distinction that this is a story, and that this kind of behavior may not be what we should strive for in our every day life…

Many of us learn that life shouldn’t be like what’s in a film, later on. At least not 24/7. There’s more to life than bar-hopping (or dodging bullets). But we still have to find that out, gradually or tragically. I think many of us stop doing these things because we get married and want to have a family. (And yes, bar-hopping can be fun, especially if we feel that there isn’t any other better use for our money, even if it was to give to charity). And in case you don’t know, seeking promiscuous sex and/or getting drunk isn’t bad in itself (really it’s not!), but it’s still quite selfish behavior. I just wanna feel good. Nothing’s wrong with that kind of attitude, but is that really what we should be looking for? Many of the self-help books (most of which I have not read) don’t really try to tell us how to live or give us guidance on what it is we should want or value.

If books did that, who would buy it? A litany of Christian morality comes to mind.

But instead, many self-help books focus on more specific tasks. Some of those tasks maybe value-based, like how to be happier in life, or how to find and keep a good woman, how to transform into a motivated person — but many of them are on specific things like how to tie someone up, how to write and think critically, how to be a better professional, how to code in Perl, how to cook for yourself now that you’re living alone in college… With each of these, we are getting the big picture taken for granted. For instance, take something as run of the mill as a programming language. Think it would be hard to tease out values from a book like that? Consider that each programming language was created with a specific problem in mind. C++ was created as a middle level language with speed and software application in mind. Java was created to do all the things C++ did, with internal dynamic memory management AND a smaller footprint so as to work on mobile devices. And what about the values of someone who buys a book on programming? What do they think is of value? Just by the type of task someone values, you can be you know something about them, given our shared world. So how does one jump from being a child (general) to being an adult (general)?

Being an adult isn’t just about being accountable or responsible (many adults are not), but also about knowing why and what you are doing. So for example, while binge drinking is probably not be responsible, but getting a designated driver is more responsible. In an ironic way then, Tucker Max may in fact be one of the most responsible people around. He’s got to be, unless someone else writes his blog for him. Keeping an online presence, writing books and finding time to keep his life in line and his online presence going is a difficult thing to learn, especially if he’s going to parties all the time.

All the same though, even if many of us want to live lives like Tucker Max, can we do it? Probably. Maybe. For a time. Many of my friends have already started to complain that they fall asleep around 1am. They can’t party like they are 23. And… Maybe Tucker Max doesn’t have a day job? I don’t think so, he doesn’t need one if he makes money writing and throwing parties. I don’t read his blog or his books. But I know many of my friends do. If anything, he is giving mixed messages, especially for those few of us who would love to live like him. But if we accept that most of us can’t be expending that much energy (to get laid), then we might be able to accept that it’s only okay for a few celebrities to live outrageously (the rest of us must settle for living vicariously, through them). After all, if we are busy getting laid, or distracted from hang-overs we cannot do the best we can. We can’t give to others with the best of intentions if we are sloppy and not together. Muhammad Ali has said “There are a lot of boys that are stronger than me that could be great champions, but they can’t fight temptation. Temptation is all around us ! Pretty girls with their chests big and ripe.” (Ali Rap, Page 25). If we have aspirations or goals, we should be focused on that and not get so distracted.

For example, if we, as a people, are concerned with the Earth, and pollution, over-population, war, and famine then we should strive to give better attention to these issues. I had an xgf who was very concerned about the Earth, about animal rights and water conservation. She would complain about people having lawns throughout the south-western United States, where we have droughts for years on end, to the point that it affects arable farm lands. And yet she became resistant to my insistence that she not use the washing machine for so few items (since they were separated by fabric, she might have only six things in the washing machine at one time). I’m not saying that we can’t be contradictory but we should not be. Likewise, we may have big ideas about a novel we would write (some day) and this might be an excuse for us to feel better about ourself, when we work hard come home tired and only want to goof off until bedtime. If having dreams and ‘goals’ is only to get us through the day with higher self-esteem then perhaps that’s really useful and I shouldn’t take your dreams or goals seriously. But if they aren’t just self-esteem bullshit then you’re gonna have to get your life focused and in order to achieve them, otherwise you’re not being honest with yourself. And if you believe your own bullshit, it’s probably going to bite you on the ass when you realize one day that you’re 40 and you’ve achieved none of the things you wanted to do when you had more freedom to choose.

But goals aside, is hedonistic behavior all that bad? Even if you had no goals and what you do doesn’t harm others, then why not do it?

Look at it this way: the most liberal of us would claim that consensual activity between two adults is their own privilege. But is it okay for two adults to say, get drunk every weekend? (Or say, did heroin, or something — anything — which made them unable to function in everyday life…) Even if they made sure those days (and the following ones too) were cleared so that it wouldn’t effect their professional life? AND if they made sure they had enough booze and food so they wouldn’t be tempted to drive? Most of us might say… yes, if they covered their loose ends. But what if they got a call from their mom in an emergency in that time (like her car broke down 500 miles away in the middle of a desert)? What if their neighbor’s house caught on fire? We can’t live with all these ‘what ifs’ and I agree that we shouldn’t live exclusively for other people — but part of being mature, I think, is to strive to better ourselves and the environment we are in, to support those of us who need support. Putting energy into a hole for momentary fun is an extremely selfish thing to do. If anything, having free time to kill ourselves with drugs is only possible by the hard work and support the rest of society gives us. People may say ‘well, I’m not hurting anyone, so why can’t I…’ and perhaps so, but one isn’t giving back to society either. We didn’t build our own house. Most of our food comes from somewhere else. Most of the products we have, we can have because parts of it were made in the 3rd world where we don’t pay those 3rd world citizens enough for them to live like us. If we had to fend for ourselves, food, shelter, clothing, supplies, medicine — in the wild — we would probably be busy ALL THE TIME. We don’t live in the wild anymore. But our environment is still not complete. There’s plenty of good left out there, to be done.

And yes, it’s a hard world. Even if you want to help, businesses and institutions won’t accept you on your good will. You have to be able to actually contribute. To get paid AND make a difference. Sometimes it takes someone giving you a chance. We shouldn’t take that for granted. Even if we live in a ‘first world’ nation (and I assume you do if you have access to the internet and time to read all this lengthy stuff) — we shouldn’t just go about fucking everything up even more. After all, someone like, say, Britney Spears might think she’s earned her position (and yes, legally she has), but really, her life isn’t exactly her own… she’s made money on the dreams, ambitions and stardom of many young fans. She’s a public figure now, because that is the life she has led. Her celebrity status is her cage. She can turn her back on other people and trash her life (if she likes) but that’s just plain selfishness and narcissism. If she lived in a more upstanding way and made a difference to the world, to help others, I am sure her life would also be richer. It may not be what she wants, and of course the decision is hers and hers alone. I am sure she (and many others) would like to be good, upstanding people. But many of us are not.

I think the problem comes about when we fail to grasp the actual relationship of what we are doing. We want the fruits of our labor but we don’t understand what it takes to really achieve (and sustain) that. For example, in order to be accepted to a position where you can maximize your good you have to study, learn the shit other people have learned and CONTRIBUTE. Being a big shot isn’t supposed to be the goal. BEING A BIG-SHOT COMES ABOUT WHEN PEOPLE RECOGNIZE YOU HAVE SOMETHING OF VALUE TO CONTRIBUTE. Then they respect you, and come to you and look up to you.

I know it doesn’t always work that way. We hear about big shots in stories, leaders who are really shit heads, who cheat people. Leaders who screw the little guy. Who have been changed by the journey to success. (In stories such leaders almost always fail). Well, that topic is for another time. What I am talking about are the values which surround the life. In a way, success is much like love. Does a self-help book tell us that love isn’t something to be found on the street? Do self-help books tell us that love should not be the goal or the FIX-IT PATCH to a relationship? Love is what happens when two people work out a good situation. Love emerges from that. Love is a side effect of good, respectful and sustained effort on both sides. Love is not a goal. Love is not gotten like winning the lottery.

I suppose it’s possible that self-help books say that. I’m sure some do. But I haven’t read them. And I don’t think people get that about love, or success or money.

This sounds really boring, maybe. It may be kind of boring. It’s also hard, and involves sacrifice. Having a productive evening can be quite satisfying. I get home from work and I try to work on the program I am writing. This doesn’t often happen, many times I spend a few hours unwinding and my entire evening is done. Time for bed!

Long term gain most often involves sacrificing short term pleasure… a personality characteristic which many of us lack. Do we as a people value hard work? Do we have what it takes for a sustained effort? If we read a self-help book, do we in fact derive help from it? I am sure only some us actually read it — and even fewer put it into practice. But can we even find knowledge about life in general from a book? Therein lies a gap between knowledge and practice… Self-help books can be useful but they aren’t complete. Individuals who read a shit ton of them probably don’t get what they need. The answer for the soul isn’t in chicken soup. Therein lies irony, since what you buy is in a book and not a can.

Books are good. They are a good place to start learning. But they aren’t the answer. There also isn’t anyone to teach us how to be mature, contributing adults — just like there isn’t anyone to teach us how to stop being children. This decision is something people have to decide to do for themselves. Most people will decide at some point that they want to be mature, or an upstanding person. And then they try and reinvent themselves — but then inevitably they since they have no idea of how to do it. We want instant fixes to things, but that’s never going to be the case. Reading a book won’t change our lives — no matter how powerful the message — unless we also start to change our behavior… and changing our behavior in ways that affect the basis — not just the symptoms. Taking a pill to solve anxiety may work in the short term, but if it’s a long term goal, then you’re probably going to have to take that pill for a very long time. Likewise, looking for love qua love isn’t the way to go.

Now, it may be a bit of a tall order to stop buying diamonds because they are blood diamonds, or stop drinking coffee because coffee generally comes from exploited coffee bean pickers. Or stop driving gas powered cars because of the United State’s dirty dealings with other countries. It may be a choice, but like success, real change can only come with small steps. Doing massive, radical movements isn’t sustainable. Liberal guilt isn’t the answer either. Liberal guilt prompts people to alleviate their guilt by doing certain charitable things and then ‘allowing’ themselves reprieve in other ways. Like, I give to breast cancer, or I did my time in India, therefore I should be able to… or I drive a hybrid car, therefore I can feel superior and lecture to others who don’t… No one has the authority to balance things like that, and guilt of that sort is ridiculous. It’s like being ashamed of being born a certain race. No real change takes sustained effort. Ask anyone from Alcoholics Anonymous or anyone trying to wean themselves off meat. Meaningful change is a one day at a time thing.

external forces; eg, god not with standing

note to self: one’s capacity to suffer does not make them a better person.

manifesto for living

alot of my friends, and old friends are not people i can really relate to. i started noticing and complaining to myself about it around 3-5 years ago. i don’t want to hear about the latest video card, or the hottest computer game. many of them have stopped talking to me about anime too. this is normal, i think.

crappy but true. people move in different directions.

i find it mostly inane but also insidious how ‘living life’ often means getting drunk and partying all night. it’s mostly harmless fun. but at the same time, it’s terribly wasteful in the same way that your parents probably found it wasteful. and if your parents didn’t find it wasteful then there’s a good chance that they may have not found much time to be your parents (ha ha…?)

but seriously. this is has been a kind of weird transformation over the years. i accept that my nights and days spent ‘partying’ or staying up all night doing ‘fun stuff’ have been lost along the way side. and i don’t really care if other people behave like that (as long as they don’t keep me up or disturb me in any particular way). many of the people who choose to, at times, cut loose and revel in somatic pleasures like drugs or getting drunk or sex or whatever are quite accomplished individuals. they have done great things, they have good career — they are not bad people. i guess there’s a bit of slight disapproval from me though, (not that it matters, because it doesnt!) as i find that the energies that go into such recreation are really just thrown away.

but the larger question comes to be, what isn’t thrown away or lost?

i spent alot of my formative years watching star trek the next generation. this is because my family (and some close friends, at the time) were really into it. i don’t have tv at my house so i watch it on tivo when i am at my parents. most of the time, visiting parents = some break for me, since i don’t have my computer and are not tempted to work late at night since i can’t. i mean i do, sometimes on their notebook computer but it’s purposefully devoid of my materials (and of dropbox) so getting onto the server and working directly from there is kind of a pain… i recognize i need some rest… so that’s how i sort of set things up for myself. anyway, watching sttng is a way of relaxing at my parents house. i really only watch tv when i am there. because there’s not much else to do and because tv is easy. it’s inane and the episodes while i have seen them all, sometimes i don’t recall. so it’s alright.

there seems to be a huge theme running throughout sttng i didn’t notice as a teenager. captain picard or members of the crew are always explaining what it means to be mortal, or whatever it means to be human. they explain to aliens who are immortal or super-powerful energy beings that “we are not like them, we die and live short lives… or explain to lesser developed aliens that “we are like you, we are not gods, we die and live short lives… (sorry if the unclosed quotes are annoying to you i did it because i am talking in his voice and my own)

but sttng is really not an exploration of the universe, but a moralistic tool that tries to brainwash the audience into thinking about the greater good of humankind and of all sentient beings… dead and alive…

this really isn’t something that we humans seem to ascribe to.

i spent about 2 hours this evening going to and coming back from a hipster art performance of sorts in north hills. it wasn’t bad. but i had also spent all last night and most of today working on a program… rewriting code and developing a new schema… i had drank a large amount of caffeine and was very focused. and really feeling impatient.

i arrived late, to meet my friend there… so i missed half the performances. i listened to a sound piece. and wondered why it was so unpleasant. a few years ago i might have tried to think deeply about the implications of various words. but like most sonic art, it escapes meaning by the use of non-linguistic sensations. like dance, it’s hard to translate into text even if it is literally in the kristevan term, inter-textual… meaning that it invokes a wide range of semiotic jolts. sound does that. it jolts us.

eventually though, i lightened up. and enjoyed the atmosphere and the sensation. but it grabs me that hipsters can be connoisseurs of sorts (i don’t consider myself one) of things art… art here, is only a collection of anything that creates different bodily sensations of light, and sound… the point of which is the sensation. so food and dance count. so does hiking and traveling. but this kind of art can be a fascinating exploration of various modes of consciousness in a way; the way a friend of mine’s installation changed the openedness of the space by stringing rope at about 10 feet above us across the room… cutting us off, in a way, from the 40+ high ceiling. these hipsters do it and then they talk about it. i find the talk inane mostly because it’s devoid of abstract language which would specify significant topological features of the individual expressions. but the fact remains really that there isnt any framework for such discussion… (as much as deleuze and guattari would like there to be) and to develop such a framework would be in some sense, to isolate one’s self in inanity…

this kind of art is all well and good, but i find myself asking if this attention to these light kinds of foray into second attentions — second because it’s not our first -daily- attention (to use some language from carlos castenada) really adds anything to our human experience. listening to soft live music from hipsters with guitars… okay maybe. it can enrich us subtly, in a sort of under-consciousness kind of way… if we choose to let it. but that kind of fantastic group explorations, which performance art is and can be, between a performer and the audience — is at best only a distraction from everything else. a sort of island from all our other energies and attentions and times.

i think we can be naked to the Name of the Father as it were, in a kierkegaard or a sartrean or a lacanian or a heideggerian way — submit ourself to the function, become the little warm center of the universe qua subject but that in itself won’t bring meaning to our activities… and maybe such a hipsteresque distraction… much like the drunking and partying that goes on every night in all the major (and minor!) settlements of the world serve as our only buffers to the general apathy of being a subject or quasi-subject. there really isn’t any kind of relief from any oppressive feeling from the Name of the Father. you hate it you love it you commit suicide because of it. and it doesn’t matter because it goes on like some crazy superego gone mad.. always to force an injunction that you comply.

personally i follow sartre mostly. i think, because i believe in choice. i don’t believe in oblivion. i don’t believe in the beautiful death that heidegger does. i don’t believe in submission and i don’t believe in any of the lacanian discourses. really, the Name of the Father is just another nomenclature for the cage of being configured as any kind of subject… and i choose to be a subject who wants to make a difference in the world. the explosion of what it means to be human (or atleast the desire for that) as radical as it sounds — is really a conservative way of foreclosing what could be, for me and i think most every one of us, to be destructive impulses that would really only get me, you and anyone else in trouble… eventually.

i don’t think i would drink myself to death. or get arrested or anything like that. although in a sci fi kind of way, anything is possible. i doubt that i would be as hysterical as the enterprise… streaking across the galaxy looking for something… but not at all knowing what that is… or like a broken record, always having to justify our tenuous position with life and bringing meaning and order in the name of peace and humanity. in a way, sttng is just us repeating to ourselves, everything is okay, we are all right. it’s not a great leap then, that star fleet headquarters is in san francisco, as lovely as that sounds… all right.

but what else is there?